[#3] Banning smoking at public places – IELTS Writing-2
Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places.
This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. What are your opinions on this? FREE! 🔗 Practice on Computerized IELTSSample Answer:
It is commonly witnessed that crucial issues relating to personal freedom and public health are raised by the discussion of smoking bans in public places. These restrictions affect people’s rights and preferences while also attempting to shield them from the damaging effects of second- hand smoke. This essay will analyse the claims made on both sides of the debate.
The first benefit of smoking bans is improved public health. To explain, people who don’t smoke can suffer from the detrimental health effects of smoke, including heart diseases and lung cancer. Therefore, respective authorities attempt to make public spaces safer for everyone by outlawing smoking in them. Secondly, limiting smoking in public places can aid in people’s attempts to quit. To justify, smokers may choose to withdraw themselves from this activity, which is beneficial for their health, if they are not permitted to smoke in their preferred bars or restaurants.
On the contrary, a section of society advocates that smoking restrictions limit personal choice. According to their perspective, even if a person’s behaviour is negative for their health, they should still have the liberty over their smoking behaviour. Furthermore, some claim that private property owners should be held accountable to determine whether smoking is permitted on their grounds and legislative bodies should not be embodied with the authority to ban smoking at public spots.
In conclusion, the argument over whether or not smoking should be banned in public areas is about striking a balance between personal freedom and public health. While these restrictions aim to safeguard individuals from the risks of passive smoke, they also pose issues with personal freedom of choice.
IMPORTANT VOCABULARY
- Witnessed: To have seen or observed something happening.
- Crucial: Extremely important or essential.
- Shield: To protect or defend from harm or danger.
- Detrimental: Harmful or causing damage.
- Respective: Belonging or relating separately to each of two or more people or things.
- Outlawing: The act of making something illegal or prohibited by law.
- Aid: Assistance or support provided to someone in need.
- Withdraw: To remove or take back something that was previously granted or offered.
- Contrary: Opposite in nature, direction, or meaning.
- Advocates: Supporters or champions of a particular cause, idea, or action.
- Perspective: A particular way of viewing or understanding a situation.
- Liberty: The state of having the freedom to make choices and act according to one’s will.
- Accountable: Responsible and answerable for one’s actions or decisions.
- Legislative: Relating to the making of laws or the branch of government responsible for creating laws.
- Embodied: Represented or manifested in a physical form or personification.
- Striking: Attracting attention due to being noteworthy, remarkable, or unusual.
- Safeguard: To protect or ensure the safety of something or someone.
- Passive: Accepting or allowing what happens without active resistance or response.
Responses